Friday, 21 May 2010

Mill Lane Bistro - restaurant review: A new legacy?

Bar 77 was a West Hampstead institution. I was one of many sad people when the owners called it a day. What came in its place was Cini. No-one knew how to pronounce it and it seemed no-one wanted to eat there. I was among many who didn't care at all when it finally closed its doors.

What now for this landmark address? The left-hand side of Bar 77 – once the venue for my 30th birthday party – is now a mini-market. But the right-hand side has become the accurately named "Mill Lane Bistro". It's rather nice.
Deliberately or not, the dark wooden tables hark back to those '77' days as does the friendly welcome. The menu now is a sort of hybrid British/French selection. It is short. Very short. I think this is good. New restaurants that try and maintain a high standard when the menu stretches across several pages are usually asking for trouble. There are three starters and three main courses along with a couple of specials. There is also a rustic bar menu too – making it very clear that you're as welcome for a drink and a bite to eat as for a full meal. Despite the brevity of choice none of the eight of us seem to struggle with what to have. It's short and it reads well. It also means we don't take long to decide.
While the starters were being prepared we turned our attention to the wine, upgrading from glasses to bottles of a good white Entre deux Mers (£16) and a Pinot Noir (£24) that had @Ghoul_of_London in raptures. The wine list didn't seem extensive, but what we had was good.

The starters duly arrived and everyone tucked in. Tom and @MarkLedder's asparagus looked great with large (hopefully English new season) spears topped with a poached egg ("slightly overdone") and "not enough" hollandaise. @chinmj's decision to go for a bar snack starter of hard thin salami sausage with bread left him sawing away at the sausages but with no complaints about flavour. The beef carpaccio, although not thin enough to merit the name, was delicious and unusually the dressing was very lightly applied, which I appreciated. Scallops varied in size from normal to enormous, leading to some quite amusing looking plates but the chef had at least tried to balance them out agaist perhaps too much of the de rigeur pea purée.
Mains of ribeye steak, sea bream (the special), rack of lamb, and a vegetarian option of rösti for @uponair all came in generous portions but far less overwhelming than the plates at LoveFood a couple of weeks earlier. The bream was particularly well presented with a "spring festival" of baby vegetables underneath an ample fillet of fish topped with a light creamy sauce and mussels although @StyleOnTheCouch seemed less impressed than I was. Some would have preferred their lamb a little pinker and we were surprised not to have been asked how we wanted it cooked, however it tasted great. @DJStoney may have even used the word "sublime". Steaks did come out as requested with @Kayskill's medium rare looking on the money.
Of course we had room for desserts: a classic lemon tart and a chocolate gourmand plate were both well received. @MarkLedder had spent the day caffeined up to his eyeballs in Paris dashing back on an earlier train so as not to miss #whampreview excitement. Immune to any further impact he joined me and @uponair in an espresso only to find that it wasn't an espresso at all but just a small strong coffee. It's a small thing but, for a French style bistro, worth getting right.

It sounds like I've picked out all the minor mistakes, but overall everyone had a great evening. Notably the overall score was quite a bit higher than the separate scores because the atmosphere is good, it's comfortable and relaxed. Service was accommodating and as the place has been open only a few weeks, it is not surprising that it hasn't quite reached perfection. I shall definitely be back and am delighted that the Bar 77 legacy has been revived. Indeed, there's no reason why the Mill Lane Bistro can't become an institution in its own right.

Ratings
Food 7.4
Service 7.8
Value 6.3
Overall 8.4
Good for: convivial people
Bad for: perfectionists
Mill Lane Bistro
77 Mill Lane
West Hampstead
London, NW6 1NB
T: 0207 794 5577

Monday, 10 May 2010

It's business time at The Winch

Whatever the eventual outcome of the election, it is unlikely to remove the need for organisations like The Winchester Project - the charity that #whampers have been supporting in 2010. Back in late March, I posted director Paul Perkins' appeal for Admin & Support help. Now, Paul is back with a new request - this time for help under the banner of Business & Enterprise.

An abridged version of his e-mail appears below. If there's any way you can help, do please contact him directly.

Dear Friend,

Our work at the Winch continues at full throttle. As well as seeing our Youth team grow and taking on new placement students and volunteers, we have recently run another successful Play Scheme over the Easter holidays, for which we had around 50 children. It's busy work, but in the holidays the building really comes alive with activity, laughter and energy. It's a great time to be around.

Following on from the Admin & Support drive, I'm delighted to say that we've had an opportunity to meet with many of you who are able to give your time and energies in the office and other areas.

Perhaps, though, that wasn't for you and you'd be able to offer more through Business & Enterprise. There are a few starting-off suggestions in the attached PDF, but there are a couple of reasons we're asking about this. One is that charities such as ours depend substantially on grants from statutory and private sources, and whilst we welcome this we're keen to reduce our dependency on these streams, in part by developing our own social enterprise activities. That's also about sustainability, and with the risk of cuts on their way from central and by extension local government, we want to develop as a more self-sufficient, sustainable voluntary sector organisation. Secondly, it's not only social enterprise which you might be able to help with but pro bono and in kind services and expertise - whatever it is you do may well add value and have relevance to our initiatives here - services and skills which can be contributed on a pro bono or in kind basis.

If you're not sure whether the skills you have, or an idea which has popped up, fits with this area, don't hesitate to drop me a line to talk it over.

In the meantime, thank you once again for being part of what we're doing at the Winch. The work, time, insight and energy which you give makes a real difference to the children and young people we serve and, ultimately, our wider community.

Best,

Paul
Paul Perkins
Director
Winchester Project
21 Winchester Road
London NW3 3NR
Tel: 020 7586 8731
http://www.thewinch.org/

Saturday, 8 May 2010

Hampstead & Kilburn as it happened

The early indications when I arrived at the Hampstead & Kilburn count were that it was going to be close. It was too soon to tell quite how close.
180 counters split between H&K and Holborn & St Pancras first had to verify the ballot papers. This means checking that the number of votes in the ballot box is the same as the number of votes that is supposed to be in the ballot box. As they do this, dozens and dozens of party supporters, candidates, council candidates, campaign teams and number crunchers - hover over them like hawks trying to keep track of how their candidates are tallying up. It looks complicated (and slightly intimidating). Pages of tallies are then fed to the geeks who presumably make extrapolations, predictions and prognostications, which seem completely pointless given that the actual result is only a matter of hours away.


There were some inevitable problems with the redrawn boundaries. Some ballot boxes had to come over from the Brent wards that now form part of the new constituency. Of course with two voting papers, people make mistakes and put parliamentary ballots into the council ballot box. These papers also had to be dispatched to Haverstock school and were one of the causes of the lengthy delay in the first count being finished.

During lulls in counting (for example while waiting for the Brent boxes), the rosette-wearing phalanxes descended into the refreshment area where the media was largely camped out along with some Camden staff. The groups coalesced into pockets of red, blue, yellow and green, all grouped around the TVs. Every time Labour held a seat a roar went up from the red corner. Whenever the Conseratives gained a seat a similarly man-sized cheer erupted. There weren't very many cheers from the yellow camp.

Any sense that Ed Fordham might romp to victory in Hampstead & Kilburn, therby justifying the exceedingly short odds available on him, was clearly evaporating. "It's very close" was the anxious utterance from all sides.
As the count neared its conclusion, the ballots for each candidate were bundled together in groups of 25, topped with an appropriately coloured piece of paper, and placed together in long rows. In even 'quite close' races, this makes it reasonably easy to see the state of play. Who's got the longest set of bundles should be easy to judge by eye. Frank Dobson's victory over Jo Shaw in the Holborn & St Pancras seat was evident well before anyone clambered on stage. In the H&K counting hall, however, the blue pile was opposite the red pile and they looked to be exactly the same length. The yellow pile was next to the blue pile and although it was hard to be sure, it did look marginally smaller. Confined to the media zone though it was hard to get a clear picture.

Tamsin Omond claimed she'd seen a pile of votes for her, relieved that she'd at least made double figures, but it seemed very clear that this was a three-horse race (who'd have thought?) and the other candidates were not going to figure in any meaningful way.
Talk of a recount had been floating around for some hours. Ed told me that he would leave any such decision to his agent, but that a gap of around 500 might be worth a second look. Chris - whose emotions normally seem to be held in check - had quite an animated conversation with me, expressing a lack of comprehension as to how on earth Glenda's vote was holding up so well.

Some time later, as we all waited for news, he blasted through from the counting hall, urgently looking for somewhere private to talk to his wife. With a face like thunder, one might have expected the worst, but a glance at the votes suggested that he was right in the mix.
The final Brent votes arrived. It looked as if Ed Fordham was out of the race now, unless.., unless there was a significant number of these "loose" ballots. Chris was unlikely to pick up many votes from Brent, so could this be Ed's chance to catch up. The report was that the pile of new ballots was slim, and thus so were Ed's chances of living up to the pre-election hype. The faces of the yellow rosettes were struggling to muster smiles. We were down to two.

Sky's journalist Orla Chennaoui, who had been hanging around with her camera crew since well before the count started, scooted over with an eavesdropped tip - just 50 seats split Chris and Glenda. A recount was inevitable. Tamsin came over with a printout of the actual figures. It really was tight, Glenda's lead was closer to 70 than 50, and Ed Fordham was less than 1,000 behind Glenda too. The others were all a long way back with the Green's Bea Campbell comfortably in fourth.
A 15 minute break was called before the recount, and we all took the opportunity to refuel. Then the counters filed back into the hall and off we went. It seemed that every counter was being scrutinised by two or three campaigners. Chris stalked around the outskirts, looking in at some counters. Everyone was exhausted, so who knows how they were able to concentrate.


Ed knew he was beaten, but found time for some supportive words for Tamsin who deep down must have hoped to do better than her 123 votes. "You ask the questions and there are only two answers", he said philosophically. I guess you can't go into politics if you're not prepared for losing.


There was a small whoop and cheer from a corps of red rosettes. Game over? Chris walked past. "How are you feeling?", "Yeah, I'm fine." It seemed there would be no second recount.
The candidates took to the stage - well, some of them did. Gene Alcantara, the BNP's Victoria Moore and, more surprisingly Bea Campbell didn't appear. Personally I think that it's a disservice to the people that bothered to vote for you not to turn up to the result. Glenda was grinning widely amid cheers.

The returning officer read out the votes starting with Alcantara's 91 and finishing with Chris Philp's 17,290. The crowds cheered "Glen-da, Glen-da". She had won by 42 votes.

It was approaching 9am. Glenda stepped forward to give her thank yous. There was a defiance amid the usual winning humility. She singled out Chris, praising his clean campaign. No mention of Ed who had played more on her residency in Lewisham and lack of activity. The Lib Dems might have a different perspective on the Conservative campaign, after an intense spell of "Vote Fordham get Gordon" literature.

Glenda talked of her pride in being the first MP for the new constituency of Hampstead & Kilburn and reiterated that she'd work hard for all residents of this area. Elsewhere, there were mutterings that she'd somehow achieved this Houdini act on the back of a couple of leaflets and some hustings performances. Apparently a Tory press officer had admitted earlier that they had expected Ed to take the seat, but the forest of literature pushed through our doors and into our hands by the Lib Dems and the Tories had ultimately been for nothing.

Chris stepped forward and was very gracious in defeat, although didn't congratulate Ed for his strong showing. Ed paid generous and warm tribute to Glenda,and thanked his campaign team amid cheers. Some people may even have had something in their eye. Ed - just 841 votes behind Glenda - said that the independent spirit would live on in NW London.

Nationally, it had been a night when the Conservatives good cheer was slightly muted and the Lib Dems had looked shocked from the moment the exit poll came out. Locally, it seemed that the scare tactics and jockeying for position as the true rivals to Labour had ended up splitting the anti-Labour vote. The night was now the day. It was over, and it belonged to Glenda Jackson.

Friday, 7 May 2010

The final results in Hampstead & Kilburn

National to local

As we watch David Cameron give his thank you speech having delivered a 22,000 majority in Witney, the situation in Hampstead & Kilburn is looking close and people are slightly tense.


There are a few issues with ballots that have wrongly ended up in Brent, there's an issue with the constituency map up on the screen (it's a Camden map that doesn't show Kilburn, but is being fixed), but the main count has begun and it's too close to call.

Have we all got caught up in a local bubble and missed the bigger national picture - the Liberal Democrat surge clearly hasn't delivered anything meaningful across the country (although Nick Clegg may well still have a very important role to play). Does this mean that Ed Fordham's campaign on the ground will have been for nothing? It's going to be close and, as I just reminded Chris Philp, the Conservative candidate's name is the last on the ballot and will be the last to be called - and thus the result won't be known until that moment. The H&K 1-2-3 could be a bit of a surprise.

Where are we again?


It's 12.40am. The green room (which has purple tablecloths) is buzzy. Lots of rosettes everywhere - yellow, blue, red, green, and others. There's a large TV showing the BBC coverage and another that seems to flit between ITV and Sky. I'm parked on a table with @camdenvotes and two young (with a small "y") Conservatives (with a big "C"), who are doing important things with pieces of paper.

The counting rooms are busy and noisy, the tables surrounded by party members and candidates verifying the counters' activities. To the uninitiated (me) it seems a bit chaotic, but clearly it's a well-oiled machine. At least I hope so.

So far have spotted only three parliamentary candidates - Chris Philp, Magnus Nielsen and Natalie Bennett (the Holborn & St Pancras Green candidate). There may be others from H&SP of course. Keith Moffitt, leader of the council, told me that the concentration required now is like "doing your finals having run a marathon".

Thursday, 6 May 2010

Decision time in Hampstead & Kilburn

So, here we are at last. Election day in Hampstead & Kilburn.

It's been fun covering the campaign in my own small way over the past few weeks, but very soon all the bickering, sniping, politicking and - dear god - leafleting will be over.

I have tried to remain impartial. Indeed, I only finally made my mind up a few days ago as to who would get my vote. I've never been a floating voter before - it was rather disconcerting. Some of you will have an idea of my intentions. Many may have the wrong idea, and hopefully some of you have no idea at all. It doesn't matter anyway.

Whether you are casting your vote for Gene, Beatrix, Ed, Glenda, Victoria, Magnus, Tamsin or Chris, do please vote. It matters. We are in a tight seat in a tight national election. I personally believe that in this constituency, tactical voting is too hard to judge.

I am voting for what I believe in. I urge you to do the same.

Tamsin Omond "met a woman on the High Road"

After my first interview with Tamsin Omond before the election kicked off, we agreed we'd speak closer to voting day to see whether her ideas had resonated with Hampstead and Kilburn constituents, whether she had a cliché's chance in hell of becoming an MP, and whether that confident manner would be battered and bruised by electioneering.

"I think it's going really well. About midway into the campaign we realised that whatever our ambitions had been, it was best to keep them small and beautiful."

Day after day of door knocking, flyering and general canvassing have certainly tempered Tamsin's ambition. "Whether we get 20, 40 or 2,000 votes I think we'll be chuffed," she argues initially. Probe a little deeper though and there's a less flippant answer. "I'm not going to predict that I'll win but I do need some votes. We would like a mandate to continue to build over the next four years, but to do that we need to get some votes, so anything between 200 and 1,000.

Tamsin urges anyone who might have been thinking of voting for her to do so, or if people are disgruntled with the others, then vote for her. She continues to argue forcefully that she's not denting the other parties' votes at all.

"I met a woman on the High Road," she says (not spotting the leaders' debate rhetoric), "who was shouting , 'How dare you stand here, you're going to split the left'. But I found it really easy to say that none of those votes naturally belong to Glenda or anyone else."

Tamsin has focused her campaign largely on Kilburn, with some door knocking in West Hampstead and Queens Park. She has canvassed at all the tube stations but otherwise ignored Hampstead where the houses are further apart, there's only one person in during the day, and they "like to have long conversations, before telling you they're voting Liberal Democrat."

In Kilburn, immigration is the overwhelming issue – she's the only candidate I've spoken to who says this – although it is usually related to housing, drugs or benefits issues. She expresses real concern over the popularity of the far right but says that when she talks to these voters, it's often a matter of explaining why some of these problems have arisen and having the discussion. These are not intransigent people.

Assuming she doesn't win the seat, what next? She is determined to build on the platform she has created here, and excitedly tells me that six council candidates across the country have said they will defect to The Commons if elected. She also needs to focus on fundraising if she is to mount a more serious challenge in four or five years time.

And for those undecided voters, or those who have never voted before. Why should they put a cross next to Omond on the ballot paper. "Because I'll be the most enthusiastic conversation starter they've ever known."

It's a tight race here in H&K, and many people will be casting their vote for the main three parties. But if the idea of something different appeals, or if you are disillusioned with the whole system, head down to the polling station and consider giving Tamsin your vote to help her build something more credible next time round.

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

Ed Fordham is "in it to win it" in Hampstead and Kilburn

Ed Fordham is sporting his golden Liberal Democrat rosette when we meet at the café that overlooks the swimming pool at Swiss Cottage Leisure Centre. They've run out of his normal almond croissants and he has to change to a chocolate one. "Is that a bad sign?" he asks. "Fordham in fourth-place shock!" He has no plans to finish fourth although is exceedingly diffident when I presume he will predict a Lib Dem win in Hampstead and Kilburn. "No no no, not at all. All the coverage is flattering, but if you believe the coverage you're sunk."

Ed has certainly had plenty of media exposure, but is also the most active of all the candidates on social media sites, especially Twitter. "I've got people helping on the campaign who I've contacted through Twitter." His Twitter relationships have also allowed him to personalise some of the thousand or so letters he signs a day, with hand-written short messages on the envelopes.

The intense level of engagement is one of the biggest changes in this campaign from the others he has contested (the 2005 general election for Hampstead & Highgate and the 2006 local election for Hampstead ward). "I've knocked on tens of thousands of more doors and tried to make it more personal. I've also been to low-profile groups, such as an alcohol abuse centre in Brent, in order to get under the skin of the constituency."

As for the issues on the doorstep, Ed says that international issues crop up regularly as of course does transport. The economy is a backdrop, but people's questions are usually very specific on issues such as corporation tax rather than on the deficit. "The other issue is that people are stunned you've knocked on their door and the reaction is usually 'you're the first person who's bothered', although sometimes you know that's not true because you remember their doorbell." Ed's normally relaxed manner occasionally gives way to this pride in remembering detail – of people's doorbells, dogs, addresses. One cannot accuse him of not knowing the "manor", although whether people need an MP who can recollect the type of flooring in their hall is unclear. And "manor"? Is that not a bit 'East End mafia' for H&K? Ed laughs, "I prefer David Beckham swank."

I raise Glenda's concern that a Lib Dem or Tory win here would leave the vulnerable neglected. Ed responded by citing the lack of any "positive intervention" in the south Kilburn housing estate for the past 18 years (although this presumably includes the last five years when his colleague Sarah Teather was MP for that area). "People underestimate how much power and influence an MP can bring to bear, and if you decided to act proactively you could achieve a lot for the people in that area."

The Conservatives have made much of Ed's quote on the NW6 blog that he wouldn't work with them in a coalition government. Of course that interview took place before Nick Clegg began suggesting that he might be prepared to work with David Cameron. Ed stands by what he said in terms of his personal position, but of course recognises that his own views are irrelevant should a Tory/LibDem coalition be on the cards.

This is just one issue that has caused spats between the blues and the yellows. I suggest that all the main candidates seem to get on well, with the exception of Ed and Chris. "It's fair to say I get on very well with Tamsin and Bea and Glenda," replies Ed. "I just find the Conservative campaign slightly disingenuous based on all the various claims of who's said what, who might not have said what, and how that's been interpreted."

The question of who's really in with a chance of winning of course crops up. Cheekily, Ed slips in one of his many rhetorical questions "Could it have been a three-way race? Absolutely. But as soon as the Tory surge stopped, not on the ground – Chris is still rushing everywhere, the thirty-somethings of West Hampstead suddenly weren't talking about Cameron." He thinks that the Lib Dem vote has hardened, and is convinced that Labour is in the race but as for Chris Philp's chances, "I think the Tories could get the shock of their lives. "

Ed claims that he hasn't been getting ahead of himself, and hasn't thought about what his first actions will be if he wins. Then he proceeds to tell me in some detail what he'll do if he wins. He wants to bring together everyone who has an impact on people who live in social housing, from council housing officers to GPs. He also wants to call a meeting of every significant religious figure in the constituency to "get the conversation going," and to encourage greater understanding not just between religious groups but between the different parts of this diverse seat.

As for national politics, Ed – like Chris – voices an interest in education among other things, but says he thinks you end up taking what you are offered. For the first four years, howeve, he just wants to be a local MP.

And if he doesn't win? While Chris jogs over Hampstead Heath, Ed will be tidying his flat (not Chris's flat – I think that's very unlikely), but is unsure after that. "There are quite a few books I'd like to write," he says. "And Mogadishu looks pretty exciting".

It's time to go – he's off to the Ham & High offices next door to be photographed voting early. But there's time for the final question. Why should we vote for Ed Fordham on May 6? "Because you've made a positive decision to do that, rather than made a negative decision about the other parties."

Chris Philp on the record

Is Chris Philp in Bank Holiday mode, or is this his Kilburn gear? The usually casually besuited Conservative PPC for Hampstead & Kilburn is wearing a grey fleece, jeans and some snazzy trainers as he chats to a supporter on the Kilburn High Road, while the wind does its best to deliver a pile of leaflets across the entire constituency in one fell swoop.

We retreat to Caffé Nero.

Chris tells me in his brisk no-nonsense style that the campaign is going well – he manages to mention that he got married here last year, which may be the best-known and least-disputed fact of this year's election in H&K. Chris neither mumbles or waffles. This is rather refreshing. When the question is one he's answered before, the answers come smoothly. Throw in an oddball, such as what has surprised him most about this campaign, and he stumbles slightly - it feels like he's searching for the on message response.

I've met Chris once before, very briefly, after the hustings a couple of weeks ago. I've seen his apperances at other hustings on video, and read about his performances as well as catching him live and overshadowed by Boris last week. In front of an audience he can be a little didactic. One-on-one, after you've got past the dubious jokes about the Lib Dem campaign ("what campaign?") he is far more personable; the poster boy image is shed for one of determined focus and commitment and it's easy to believe that Chris would work hard for the constituency.

He says that the economy and jobs is a major issue being raised on the doorstep, and that holds true across the whole constituency. Public services are also at the forefront of people's minds, especially education – one of Chris's particular interests: "People are feeling that the state is failing to meet their needs".

Business rates are a particularly local challenge, especially in West Hampstead. West End Lane businesses have seen rates double recently compared to an average London increase of 10 percent, due to valuations that said that property prices had shot up in the area. The Conservatives are saying that, if elected, they will make small business relief automatic to ease the burden on this sector.

Glenda Jackson had said that affordable social housing was the main issue she was encountering and I put it to Chris that the Conservatives were keen to sell off local housing stock. He set out the context for Camden's sell-off, placing the blame on the previous Labour-run council that had failed to invest in maintaining properties. This had led the current Lib-Dem/Conservative coalition in Camden to sell off 500 of the council's 25,000 properties, of which 130 have been sold thus far. The money raised, he argued, was going towards upgrading the rest of the housing stock. This would hold through until 2012-2013. Further funding would come from both within the existing budget and the rather drastic measure of rebuilding some council housing with higher density estates from which surplus stock could be sold off.

Chris slammed Labour claims that the Tories would cut Sure Start, "categorically assuring" me that Sure Start would not be cut and saying that such smears were symptomatic of Labour's "ethical bankruptcy". While we're on the subject of categorical answers, he also denies point blank that his campaign has received any money from Lord Ashcroft.

Does he, I asked, agree with David Cameron that Britain is broken? Chris answers carefully, perhaps aware that this term has become quite emotive, saying he belives that "some parts of society are broken", citing the country's high rate of teenage pregnancy, long-term unemployment, and Britain's high debt.

I had wondered whether all the tedious bickering between the parties here about exactly which of them were serious contenders for this seat might have finally been put to bed. However, Chris was adamant that this was still a two-horse race and no, Ed Fordham was not one of those horses. He alleged that a Lib Dem activist had placed a major bet on Ed to win in order to reduce the bookmakers' odds – even suggesting that Nick Clegg's party pulled this trick across the country. To my mind, it seems slightly risky to be so confident that the Lib Dems won't be in the mix on election day.

If he does not win the seat, Chris says he plans to sleep and then go for a run on Hampstead Heath, but has not thought beyond that. If he is returned as the MP for Hampstead & Kilburn in the early hours of May 7th, his first meaningful tasks will be to work on sprucing up the Kilburn High Road and focusing on the proposed new school in Swiss Cottage. Indeed, he expressed an interest in an education role in any future Conservative government, "I went to state school and – against the odds perhaps – went to Oxford. I believe all children should have equal opportunities," continuing to argue that educational attaintment should not be based on parental wealth – either in terms of affording private education, or moving to more expensive areas where the best state schools are found.

Finally, the question for all the candidates. Why should I vote for Chris Philp? "Because I have a great track record of getting things done, and it's the only way to be sure of a change of government."

Before returning to his wingmen, who are valiantly trying to woo the electorate on the High Road, Chris pops to the gents thereby missing the sight of his rival Ed walking past the Tory stall. Another great photo opportunity missed.

Monday, 3 May 2010

Lovely food at LoveFood? Restaurant review

[Ed:LoveFood is now an upstairs café and the restaurant has closed]

If you love food in the sense that you enjoy it in large quantities, then LoveFood's restaurant will not disappoint. If you love food in the sense of enjoying quality ingredients cooked exquisitely, then modify your expectations slightly, but don't throw them out of the window.

Seven of us descended into the basement below the delicatessen/crêperie/café on West End Lane in West Hampstead a little unsure what to expect. Would we be the only diners? No. Would it be one of those soulless basement restaurants with the ambience of a doctors' waiting room? No. Would there be a dish involving prawns and chilli? Yes.

For those who remember when downstairs was an extension of the shop, the attempt to imbue it with atmosphere is impressive. Dark wood tables, and some Farrow & Ballesque paintwork make it an appealing venue, although one wouldn't want to be the only couple there I suspect.

The menu is oddly imbalanced, with just six starters and five desserts but 13 main courses, which are largely chargrilled meat dishes (which meats? All.). Almost all come with the same vegetables – in our case sautéed new potatoes and a selection of (very nice as it turned out) seasonal veg. There are vegetarian options, such as the ultimate ironic dish of "spelt spagueti".

To kick off, four of us dived into the borscht, which met with universal approval. It was not the beetroot purée that some were used to, but a thinner soup laden with pieces of beetroot at the bottom. Everyone was impressed. My own wild boar paté was good, with the right proportion of pate to toast.


Brad's houmous/pita/olives combo was similarly well balanced - a rare occurrence in my experience. Sue opted for the sweet chilli prawns, avocado and garlic bread. Having just returned from Australia she probably expected something light – Asian fusion perhaps. Prawns and salad and some garlic bread drizzled with some chilli sauce didn't quite cut it. Spot the mistake? Yes, she did too. We asked our gangly slighty awkward waiter about the avocado and he disappeared. "Perhaps he'll just bring you a whole one," I said. Perhaps he heard me, as a few minutes later when the plate was nearly clean, a small dish with six slices of avocado appeared. Classy.

For main course, meat was the order of the day. James had sirloin steak (very thick and cooked correctly to order), Sue had lamb (from the world's largest lamb clearly), Brad had chicken stuffed with Brie (for an extra £2 you can specify organic chicken), Jane and I both had the duck, which was nice, but mine at least cooked a little longer than I'd asked for. Sarah had calves liver, or possibly several calves' livers, on a bed of mashed potato, and Tom had baked haddock (and the cleanest plate at the end of the day).

The food was generally well flavoured and, with almost all dishes under £10, definitely good value. In fact, there was really too much for almost all of us and perhaps separate shared dishes of the potatoes in particular would have made for less overwhelming plates of food.

There was a long pause and some waving at the security cameras before we got offered dessert – we chose to share three between us – a cheesecake, a honey & carrot cake, and a chocolate cake. All were excellent. Dessert wine seemed to come in larger measures than is customary (no-one complained) and by the end of the meal everyone could safely say that midnight snacking would not be required.


The bill was just £30 a head, including service and three bottles of wine – a very serviceable house red and two bottles of an acceptable if not outstanding Rioja. Service definitely let the place down – our waiter was well meaning but along with the avocado incident, we had to ask for things a couple of times and it wasn't up to the standard of the food. But quibbles aside, for some decent food served in generous portions, this is well worth having in your back pocket next time your friends venture up to West Hampstead.

Ratings
Food 7.0
Service 5.1
Value 8.7
Overall 8.0
Good for: hungry people
Bad for: people in a hurry
LoveFood
202 West End Lane
West Hampstead
London, NW6 1SG
T: 0207 433 3733
http://www.wealllovefood.com/

Can Gordon save Glenda? The PM comes to Kilburn

Sadly, I missed all the excitement of Gordon Brown's hardcore day of touring London seats, including our very own Hampstead & Kilburn. Disappointed to have been unable to cover this for you, I've asked the very partial (but also the very present) Mike Katz, local Labour activist and council candidate for Camden's Kilburn ward to write a few words. Also read Richard Osley's account here.


"I’m sure the North London Tavern on Kilburn High Road has had its share of excitement, but today must have been a cut above the norm.

Dozens of Labour party supporters, local press and TV crews crammed into the pub’s upstairs room to hear the rallying cry for the last week of the election campaign from Hampstead & Kilburn’s Labour candidate Glenda Jackson, and the Prime Minister.

Gordon Brown was in great form, especially for a man who has just spent the last month on the road, and a bullish mood saying he was going to 'fight every single moment of the day until Thursday' to make people aware of the threat to jobs and the economy if the Tories take power. Glenda was full of passion too, talking about the importance of realising the potential of “our greatest natural resource – our people”.


Much of the news coverage focused on what happened afterwards. Some local Lib Dems turned up to heckle, so most of us bounded outside to ensure they didn’t have the last word. There was some largely good-natured badinage and a bit of jostling but nothing too serious.

Given our enthusiasm, and the fact that we were trying to stay on the pavement to avoid the traffic, we all ended up crowding round the door on Christchurch Avenue making it more or less impassable – so it’s no big surprise that Mr & Mrs Brown had to use an unorthodox exit (through the cellar, I believe). I didn’t actually see them come out, just heard a big cheer and the crowd instantly moving off afterwards. All that was left was to crowd round a BBC reporter and chant 'Glenda, Glenda' to make sure no-one was left unsure of the hearty Labour support in Kilburn.

Some people do this every day in the election campaign. It was fun, but once was enough. I prefer a gentle stroll from door-to-door myself."